SAK'EM
boycott saks fifth avenue
Editors Note:
After reading court testimony of Saks Fifth Avenue store personnel, it is painfully
obvious that they are manipulating the truth about the events that occurred inside of
their Beverly Hills store as it pertains to their accusations against Winona Ryder. For
this reason, we strongly urge our readers to
SAK'EM PERMANENTLY BOYCOTT Saks Fifth Avenue. |
THE PINCHING OF WINONA
or How To Shoplift A Woman's
Reputation
by
JUDITH HANEY
USNewsLink/June 9, 2002
After reading various and sundry
contradictory sworn testimony offered up against Winona Ryder by Saks Fifth Avenue
employees in support of their allegations of criminal charges pending
against her, I decided to do my own research into the case.
This case stinks to high
heaven! Here's why:
a. From the bench, during the
proceedings, the trial judge shoplifted Ryder's constitutionally guaranteed right to a
presumption of innocence, and, also,
b. the larcenous judge pilfered
Ryder's right to equal protection under the law vis a vis her right to due process.
Here's how this gas bag public official, 'dah
judge', unlawfully took the personal reputation of Ryder, with the intent
to deprive her permanently of it:
THE TRIAL JUDGE
1. Beverly Hills Superior Court Judge Elden
S. Fox made the following statements from the bench during Ryder's pre-arraignment
hearing: "There is sufficient cause to believe that Ms. Winona Ryder is guilty and
that she be ordered held to answer." Therefore, since the judge has already
decided Ryder's guilt BEFORE her trial, let's skip due process and send her straight to
jail.
SAKS FIFTH AVENUE
EMPLOYEES
2. The LA Times has reported that a Saks employee
testified that he recovered four sensor tags--some with material still attached to
them--from a coat pocket in the Chanel boutique in the department store. The employee
further alleged under oath that two more tags were found in a chair in another changing
room Ryder had occupied.
3. The NY Post has reported that the same employee
testified that he found four sensor tags in a changing room used by Ryder.
4. Another Saks employee testified that she
observed Ryder through dressing room slats where her vision was obstructed by garment bags
and other obstacles.
5. The Miami Herald reported on 6/8/2002,
"Evans also said six anti-theft sensor tags that had been cut off of merchandise were
found concealed in the store the day after Ryder's arrest last December".
6. NEWSWEEK reported in its June 7 web edition
that "the district attorneys office has evidence that purportedly shows Dec. 12
wasnt Ryders first shoplifting incident."
7. At Thursdays hearing, a Saks employee
testified that after being confronted, the actress signed a statement admitting she had
stolen 20 items.
Recently I visited a Saks
Fifth Avenue store for the purpose of investigating the type of doors they install in
their dressing rooms. My findings are as follows:
a. it is "possible" for
a Saks security person to see through the slats into the dressing room because the slats
are spread farther apart than a typical slatted door installed into a residence. These
slatted doors are a security enhancement which are custom made to afford store employees a
full view of the activities of customers inside each of the rooms.
While they afford customers the illusion
of privacy, in fact, anyone who stands outside of the door has an unobstructed view
into the dressing rooms where customers change clothes;
b. it is "possible" for
a shopper who is using the Saks dressing rooms to see a Saks security person standing
outside of the door. For a security person to be able to observe someone inside of the
dressing room they would have to be standing in full view of the customer who was on the
other side of the door because that is the only way to see inside;
c. the slatted doors offer no
privacy whatsoever;
d. while Winona was inside of the
dressing room she would have known that she had no privacy;
e. Saks security personnel stated
that as they stood outside of the slatted door they observed Winona 'bent over the
merchandise, clipping off the sensor tags with a pair of scissors and simultaneously
stated that their vision was blocked by her shopping bags and other things that belonged
to her.
f. apparently Saks wants the court
to believe that their vision was obstructed while simultaneously being able to see Winona.
But, Saks can't have it both ways.
Either they saw her or they
didn't. These conflicting statements are essential to Saks case and are easily refuted.
THE BEVERLY HILLS POLICE
DEPARTMENT
8. Ryder has been charged with possession of a
controlled substance, i.e., her prescription painkillers.
9. When Ryder was arrested the Beverly Hills
Police Department told the press that Saks had Ryder's 'crimes' on videotape, however,
this has turned out not to be true.
CONCLUSION BASED UPON THE
'EVIDENCE' THUS FAR
In my opinion, a crime has been
committed against Winona Ryder by Saks Fifth Avenue and its personnel, to wit, they have
stolen her reputation via making inconsistent and unsupported allegations against her.
Further, the negative PR campaign currently being
waged against Ryder by the LA DA's office is a travesty of justice.
Regardless of whether Ryder took anything from the
store without paying for it or not, there is one thing for certain, she has been
repeatedly victimized by the local California court, the trial judge, the Beverly Hills
Police Department, and Saks Fifth Avenue, i.e., the same outfit who sold her $3700.00
worth of merchandise at the same exact time that they accused her of grand theft.
What nonsense!
In my opinion, this criminal case is nothing but a
hatchet job on Ryder, and for what it's worth, I hope those who have so cruelly victimized
her and used the court to do it, are made to answer for it.
And in the meantime,
SAK'EM, BOYCOTT SAKS FIFTH AVENUE! And while we're at it, let's BOYCOTT LOS ANGELES AS
WELL!
UPDATE:
10/9/2002:
Prosecutors Ask to Drop Winona Ryder Drug Charge
Prosecutors said on
Wednesday they have requested the dismissal of a felony drug charge against actress Winona
Ryder, who is due to go on trial next week accused of shoplifting.
The Los Angeles District
Attorney's office said it was making its request "in the interests of justice"
after receiving a sworn statement from a defense witness. The details of the statement,
disclosed during the pretrial discovery phase, were not immediately available.
11/6/2002: Winona Ryder Found Guilty of 2 Counts in
Shoplifting Case |
WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND FOR THIEVING,
STEALING, SORRY, STINKING, SCUMMY SAKS
Another top Saks executive leaving embattled
company amid criminal investigation
BIRMINGHAM,
Ala. - Wednesday, August 24, 2005 - George Jones has resigned as
president and chief executive of Saks Inc.'s department store group, the Birmingham-based
chain said Tuesday.
Jones is the fifth high-ranking executive to
resign this year from Saks, which has been selling off pieces of its department store
group and is the subject of a federal investigation. A week ago, James Scully, the
company's top human resources executive, resigned to join J.Crew.
Saks will not replace Jones, said
spokeswoman Julia Bentley. Toni Browning, who was chief executive of Proffitt's and
McRae's, will relocate to Birmingham to oversee the 41-store Parisian chain. Another 10
staffers in various areas, including merchandising and marketing, also have moved to
Birmingham from Proffitt's Alcoa, Tenn., base, Bentley said.
Selling off units:
Earlier this year Saks began selling off
pieces of its department store group so it can concentrate on its luxury chain, Saks Fifth
Avenue. In April, Charlotte-based Belk purchased most of the Proffitt's and McRae's stores
for $622 million. The company plans to sell all of its remaining department stores except
for the Parisian chain.
Saks is also trying to sell its Club Libby
Lu specialty-store chain, one of several concepts Jones touted as a way to differentiate
Saks' department stores from their competitors. Jones also was instrumental in the
company's failed partnership with FAO Inc., the bankrupt parent company of toy retailer
FAO Schwarz.
Saks agreed in 2003 to sell the retailer's
toys in most of its department stores and invested $5 million in the company, acquiring a
12 percent stake and a seat on FAO's board. Later that year FAO filed for bankruptcy
protection less than eight months after emerging from another bankruptcy, and Saks gave up
its seat on the board.
"It is the appropriate time for George
Jones to explore his options outside the company with the recent sale of
Proffitt's/McRae's and with the strategic alternative process underway for the northern
department stores," Bentley said.
"He (Jones) is in the process of
exploring several opportunities. We are very appreciative of George's leadership over the
last four years and wish him much success in the future," she said.
Jones, 54, will leave the company Sept. 30,
Bentley said. He was unavailable for comment.
Sluggish share prices:
Jones joined Saks in 2001 after serving as
president of Warner Bros.' studio stores for seven years. Prior to that, Jones served as
CEO of the Roses Stores chain and held a variety of management positions with Target
stores, as well as the Diamonds and Dillards department store chains.
Saks has struggled with a sagging stock
price the past few years despite registering nearly $7 billion a year in sales.
Saks said this month it is
postponing its second-quarter earnings release until after Sept. 1 as it prepares to
restate up to six years of earnings amid a federal accounting probe for improperly
collecting $20 million in vendor payments.
The company is expected to file its delayed
fiscal 2004 annual report and first-quarter report with the Securities and Exchange
Commission by Sept. 1.
SAKS FIFTH AVENUE:
A lousy company with lousy business practices!
Saks
fires executives after completing markdown probe
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. - Saks
Inc. on Monday, 05/09/2005, said it has fired its chief accounting officer and other top
officers after an internal investigation into improper collections of markdown allowances
found that $20 million was inappropriately taken from vendors between 1999 and 2003.
The company - which is also the target of an
informal inquiry by the Securities and Exchange Commission and U.S. Attorney's Office in
New York - said no improper collections were identified as having taken place last year.
Saks said it would reimburse vendors for money taken.
Suppliers pay markdown money to compensate
stores when they don't sell products or are forced to take a deeper markdown than
expected. Over the past few years, stores have placed more financial pressure on
suppliers, and that's expected to get worse as stores consolidate and have more power in
negotiations.
As a result of the review, the retailer said
it has asked Chief Accounting Officer Donald Wright and Saks Fifth Avenue Chief
Administrative Officer Donald Watros to resign from their positions. Brian Martin,
formerly the company's general counsel, was also asked to resign.
Saks said other employees "directly
involved in the over-collection" will also be asked to resign. The company added that
employees who failed to "adequately supervise" those involved in such
over-collections will receive disciplinary actions including termination.
The company expects to restate of financial
statements for fiscal 1999 through the third quarter of fiscal 2004. The restatement will
be completed on or before Sept. 1.
|